Which statement accurately describes stop-and-frisk (Terry stop) and its limitations?

• A. A full body search is allowed if there is reasonable suspicion.
• B. It is a limited pat-down for weapons when there is reasonable suspicion; cannot search for evidence beyond weapons or extend beyond safety.
• C. It requires probable cause to detain and search.
• D. It allows a search of the vehicle during a stop.

Answer: (B)

The main idea is that a Terry stop is based on reasonable suspicion and allows only a brief, safety-focused action: a protective frisk for weapons. The frisk is narrowly tailored to detecting weapons; it does not amount to a full body search or a search for evidence. If nothing suspicious is found, the stop ends quickly. If weapons are found, the officer may take additional steps consistent with safety and legal grounds, but a broader search for non-weapon evidence isn’t allowed solely under a Terry stop. Vehicle searches aren’t authorized by this stop alone; a vehicle search requires other lawful grounds such as probable cause, consent, or a specific exception.